Legal Opinion
United States v. Armstrong
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 21, 2008No. 07-30286PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge:
Defendants Cherlyn Armstrong Scherer Prejean (“Armstrong”), the Scherer Corporate Defendants, 1 and Dr. Suzette Cul-lins (“Dr. Cullins” and collectively, the “Defendants”) were convicted following a jury trial of offenses relating to a scheme to illegally dispense certain controlled substances in violation of the Controlled Substances Act (the “CSA”), 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a). Armstrong and Dr. Cullins appeal from their convictions under the CSA. Armstrong also challenges certain eviden-tiary rulings that she argues tainted her conviction for conspiracy to…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Gore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gonzales v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- United States v. Paul VolkmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. John Heard, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. David DiehlCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Elechi OtiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.