Legal Opinion

Hutto v. Ray

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 9, 1940No. 14996PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fishburne.

Isaac Hutto died in the year 1857, leaving a will which contained the following devise: “My land is to belong to my beloved wife Velier during her lifetime and all other property and after her death is to be equally divided between my children and after their death to their children and the remaining part of my property at the death of my beloved wife Velier is to be equally divided between my children.”

Velier Hutto, to whom a life estate was given under the will, died many years ago. Isaac W. Hutto, a son of the testator, died…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clark v. NevesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  2. First Carolinas Joint S.L. Bk. of Cola. v. FordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  3. Cureton v. LittleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  4. Duckett v. ButlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  5. Pearson v. EasterlingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Belue v. FetnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
  2. Williams v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Schroder v. AntipasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  4. Newnham v. Forest Hills, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  5. Woodle v. Hl Tilghman, Jr.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API