Legal Opinion

Newnham v. Forest Hills, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 4, 1940No. 15174PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChiEE Justice Boni-iam.

The order of Judge Bellinger follows :

This action is one for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of the real estate described in the complaint. The Master, to whom the issues were referred, has recommended that the defendant be ordered to comply with the terms of the contract sought to be enforced.

The matter is now before me upon exceptions to the master and the questions raised by the exceptions all involve the construction of the will of Emma C. Newnham, deceased.

The plaintiffs have entered into a contract…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walker v. AlversonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  2. Adams v. VernerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
  3. Hutto v. RaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  4. Cureton v. LittleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  5. Lucas v. ShumpertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shelley v. ShelleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  2. Wates v. Fairfield Forest Products Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  3. Peecksen v. PeecksenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  4. Schroder v. AntipasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  5. Tiencken v. ZerbstSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API