Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Phillips

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 10, 2000No. 1981083PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. A. Phillips was charged with hunting over a baited field, in violation of § 9-11-244, Ala. Code 1975. At trial, Phillips denied having any knowledge that the field in which he was hunting was baited. The trial court, over Phillips's objection, held that hunting over a baited field is a strict-liability offense. The trial court then instructed the jury that if Phillips had hunted over a baited field he could be found guilty even without proof that he baited the field or even knew that it was baited. The jury found Phillips guilty, and he appealed. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. Louis Delahoussaye, David Lemoyne Knerien and Robert Lee RichardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Sullens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  3. Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  4. Harrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  5. W.F. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API