Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 29, 2005No. CR-03-1202PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

917 So.2d 159 (2005)

Raymond Keith SCOTT

v.

STATE of Alabama.

CR-03-1202.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 29, 2005.

Rehearing Denied June 17, 2005.

T. Jefferson Deen III, Mobile, for appellant.

Troy King, atty. gen., and Nancy M. Kirby, deputy atty. gen., for appellee.

2Per curiam

Raymond Keith Scott entered Alford[1] "best interest" pleas of guilty to two charges of showing or allowing to be shown for entertainment purposes female genitals, pubic area, or buttocks with less than a fully opaque covering, or female breasts with less than a fully opaque covering of any portion thereof below the top of…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Cobb; Concurrence · Shaw.

3Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ronald Hunter, Jr. v. Leeds, City ofCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  2. G.E.G. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  3. 1568 Montgomery Highway, Inc. v. City of HooverSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  4. G.E.G. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  5. Lansdell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API