United States v. Louis Delahoussaye, David Lemoyne Knerien and Robert Lee Richard
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GEE, Circuit Judge:
Appellants were convicted of violating two federal regulations promulgated by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to statutory authority conferred on him by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 16 U.S.C. § 703 et seq. These are designed to conserve migratory game, such as the ducks here concerned, by regulating the means employed in taking them. The regulations here in point 1 generally forbid the use of live decoys (callers) and the use of grain or the like as artificial bait. They read, in pertinent part:
No person shall take migratory game birds:(f) By the use or aid of live…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Kathryn Frances HandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Kathryn Frances HandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. OlesenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1961
3Cited by41 opinions
- The United States of America v. Joe Alvin AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. EnglerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- United States v. CorrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Chester Sylvester, Ted Burn Sylvester, Floyd Soileau, Timothy Sylvester, and Jules ErickeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Kenneth A. ManningCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.