Legal Opinion

Russell v. City of Grandview

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1951No. 31765PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.

This is- an appeal by the city of Grandview and Earle Bugge, its water superintendent, from judgments awarding damages for injuries sustained by the individual respondents and for the recovery of money paid on fire insurance policies by the corporate respondents. The two actions maintained by the respective respondents were con solidated for trial and also for the appeal. Reference to respondents will concern the individuals unless otherwise specified.

On and prior to October 26, 1949, the city of Grandview owned and operated a municipal water plant for the purpose of furnishing a domestic…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Aronson v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Bjork v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Purdy v. ShermanWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Nevala v. City of IronwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Lasityr v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Port of Seattle v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's UnionWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Cox v. Charles Wright Academy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Albin v. National Bank of CommerceWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Hutton v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Kaul v. City of ChehalisWashington Supreme Court · 1954

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API