Legal Opinion

Bernstein's Duck Farm v. Town of Brookhaven

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1947PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtL. Barrow Hill, J.

This is a multiple motion to dismiss the complaint on no less than six grounds or, in the alternative, to strike out certain portions of the complaint as irrelevant and unnecessary.

Plaintiff, for his part, objects to a consideration of the points raised by the defendant because the notice of motion does not specify the particular sections of the Civil Practice Act -under which it is made. Also, since the moving* papers contain no affidavits, plaintiff contends that, in any event, the motion can be considered under rule 106 but not under rule 107, e.g*., the Statute of Limitations objection…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thomann v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Sammons v. . City of GloversvilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Schenker v. Village of LibertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  4. Realty Associates, Inc. v. StoothoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. Hoffman v. MittlemannCity of New York Municipal Court · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grant v. Town of KirklandNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Grant v. Town of KirklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API