Legal Opinion

Grant v. Town of Kirkland

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenry A. Hudson, J.

The plaintiffs have moved for an order striking out paragraph “Third” of the defendant’s answer upon the ground that it is insufficient as a matter of law. Paragraph “ Third ” of the defendant’s answer reads as follows: “ As and for a further defense to the plaintiff’s alleged cause of action the defendant alleges: That the plaintiff has failed to comply with the requirements of Section 50-e of the General Municipal Law as a condition precedent to the commencement of this action. ’ ’

The cause of action set forth in the plaintiffs’ complaint is an equitable action brought to abate and remove…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thomann v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Sammons v. . City of GloversvilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Realty Associates, Inc. v. StoothoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  4. Foster v. WebsterNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Jayne v. East Hills Water DistrictNew York Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harrigan v. Town of SmithtownNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Kyle v. Village of CatskillNew York Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API