Legal Opinion · Dissent

Grant v. Town of Kirkland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 16, 1960Published

1DissentHalpebh, J.

In my opinion, Special Term properly denied the motion to strike out the affirmative defense based on section 50-e of the General Municipal Law.

Even if we assume that under the existing statutes, no notice of claim need be served in connection with a claim against a town for incidental damages in an action for equitable relief, it does not follow that the affirmative defense should be stricken from the answer in this case on a motion in advance of trial. It cannot be determined until the trial whether the plaintiffs will succeed in their prayer for equitable relief. It may well turn out upon…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1908
  2. Reining v. . City of Buffalo, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Thomann v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Sammons v. . City of GloversvilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Ferguson v. Village of HamburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API