Legal Opinion

Realty Associates, Inc. v. Stoothoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 22, 1940PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClose, J.

The plaintiff instituted this action against the respondents for an injunction and damages, based upon the alleged wrongful obstruction of the waters of a stream whereby plaintiff’s lands were submerged. The respondents obtained an order per*463mitting the joinder of the appellant County of Nassau as a party defendant, and thereafter served separate cross-complaints alleging in substance that the damage originated in the wrongful acts of appellant in enlarging the outlet of a nearby lake and negligently constructing a reservoir of insufficient capacity to dispose of the increased volume of water…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chapman v. . ForbesNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Thomann v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Mahr v. Norwich Union Fire Insurance SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Picciano v. Nassau County Civil Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Malcuria v. Town of SenecaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Grant v. Town of KirklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  4. Stiger v. Village of Hewlett Bay ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  5. Hirsch v. Albany Savings BankNew York City Court · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API