Legal Opinion
Ben Bimberg & Co. v. Unity Coat & Apron Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
This action is by judgment creditors to set aside the sale of a business as not complying with section 44 of the Personal Property Law, commonly designated as the Bulk Sales Law.
The facts are free from dispute. The business of the judgment debtor, the sale of which is here challenged, was that of supplying laundered coats, aprons and similar laundered articles to customers, for which service the customers paid. To serve her customers the judgment debtor kept and maintained a stock of coats, aprons, etc.
The subject of the sale was the entire “ business of supplying clean laundered coats,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mott v. ReevesNew York Supreme Court · 1925
- Mott v. ReevesNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Pritz v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Stewart v. SulgerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Meier Electric & Machine Co. v. DixonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Seedman v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Best Manufacturing, Inc. v. White Plains Coat & Apron Co. (In Re Daniele Laundries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Sternberg v. RubensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- In re SarawCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Sapphire Corp. v. American Mercury Magazine, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.