Legal Opinion

Weiss v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1959No. 6706PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

This case arises under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, A.R.S. Title 23, Ch. 6, § 23-901 et seq. It is before us for review on a writ of certiorari heretofore issued to the Industrial' Commission of Arizona (hereinafter referred to as Commission) to determine whether that tribunal erred, as a matter of law, in its application of the pertinent statutes to the conceded, facts. The precise question of law raised is whether the term “partial loss of use” — , as set forth in A.R.S. § 23-1044(B) (21),. which prescribes the means of computing the compensation to be awarded in cases-of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Coca-Cola Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Costanzo v. TillinghastSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Local 266, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Steward v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Haggard v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Company v. Cochise CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Dutra v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Egbert v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Gomez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. Perez v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API