Weiss v. Industrial Commission
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Justice.
This case arises under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, A.R.S. Title 23, Ch. 6, § 23-901 et seq. It is before us for review on a writ of certiorari heretofore issued to the Industrial' Commission of Arizona (hereinafter referred to as Commission) to determine whether that tribunal erred, as a matter of law, in its application of the pertinent statutes to the conceded, facts. The precise question of law raised is whether the term “partial loss of use” — , as set forth in A.R.S. § 23-1044(B) (21),. which prescribes the means of computing the compensation to be awarded in cases-of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Coca-Cola Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Costanzo v. TillinghastSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Local 266, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- Steward v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Haggard v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. Cochise CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Dutra v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Egbert v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Gomez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Perez v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.