Martin G. Imbach, Inc. v. Tate
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment on a verdict for injuries claimed to have been sustained by the appellee when struck by a falling pier shed.
The pertinent facts of the case follow. Mutual Chemical Company owned a pier at the foot of Philpot Street in Baltimore, which was covered by a roof or shed. This pier had been leased to the Miller Chemical Company, which had been using it for the storage of bags of fertilizer and manure. The appellant, Martin G. Imbach, Inc., entered into a contract with Mutual to remove the roof or shed from the pier because of its bad condition. On May 15, 1951,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Baltimore City Passenger Railway Co. v. KempCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
- Eisenhower v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- Charlton Bros. Transportation Co. v. GarrettsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- Joseph R. Foard Co. v. Maryland ex rel. GoralskiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1914
- Mayor of Baltimore v. BassettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. PlewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Safeway Trails, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Aleshire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Jewel Tea Co. v. BlambleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.