Jewel Tea Co. v. Blamble
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtSybert, J.
This appeal raises the question whether, in a Workmen’s Compensation case, the trial court properly permitted the jury to determine, on the basis of subjective lay testimony, that the employee was 100 per cent disabled when all the expert medical testimony in the case was to the contrary. From a judgment entered on the jury’s verdict of 100 per cent disability, the employer appeals.
The facts are undisputed. Appellee, Josephine Blamble, was employed as a door to door saleslady by the appellant, Jewel Tea Company, Inc. While making a call in the village of Eckhart Mines on August 7, 1959, she…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ager v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Congoleum Nairn, Inc. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
- Drakulich v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- Prudential Insurance v. BrookmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
- Travelers Ins. Co. v. BlazierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Montgomery County v. BuckmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Wilhelm v. State of Maryland Traffic Safety CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Mayor of Baltimore v. CassidyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Fenwick Motor Co. v. FenwickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- S.B. Thomas, Inc. v. ThompsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.