Legal Opinion

Joseph R. Foard Co. v. Maryland ex rel. Goralski

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 5, 1914No. Nos. 1272-1275PublishedCited by 51 opinions

Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore; John C. Rose, Judge. Suits in admiralty by the State of Maryland, to the use of Frances Goralski, widow, Mary Goralski, infant, Joseph Gielner, and Andrew Gielner, against the General Stevedoring Company, the Joseph R. Foard Company of Baltimore City, the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City, and the Munson Steamship Line, and by Gustave Lies against the same respondents and…

Read the full summary

Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore; John C. Rose, Judge. Suits in admiralty by the State of Maryland, to the use of Frances Goralski, widow, Mary Goralski, infant, Joseph Gielner, and Andrew Gielner, against the General Stevedoring Company, the Joseph R. Foard Company of Baltimore City, the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City, and the Munson Steamship Line, and by Gustave Lies against the same respondents and the Maryland Steel Company, with 16 other cases. Decrees for libelants against the General Stevedoring Company and the…

1Opinion of the Court

WOODS, Circuit Judge.

On the morning of March 7, 1913, a large quantity of dynamite exploded on the British steamship Alum Chine lying in the quarantine anchorage of the port of Baltimore on the Patapsco river. The ship was destroyed, more than 30 men were killed and a number injured, and other ships in the vicinity were damaged. The first indication of the disaster was a slight explosion or puff in or near a box of dynamite which Bomhardt, a stevedore foreman, was trying to force into position in a tier of boxes. The District Court heard together the 25 libels filed, and held in an elaborate…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Workman v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Michigan Central Railroad v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. MacMullen v. . City of MiddletownNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. In re Watertown Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. Du BoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Commonwealth v. Beneficial Finance CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Deena Artware, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Transamerica Leasing, Inc. v. La Republica De Venezuela and Fondo De Inversiones De VenezuelaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API