Legal Opinion

In re Hoo

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 13, 1945No. 80390PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODMAN, District Judge.

The petitioner, a native and national of China, seeks citizenship under the provisions of section 311 of the Nationality Act of 1940, 8 U.S.C.A. § 711. He may be admitted under 8 U.S.C.A. § 711, if he shows that for at least one year preceding the filing of his petition for naturalization, he was married to a citizen of the United States and, for at least two years prior thereto, was a resident of the United States.1

In support of his petition, petitioner alleges that he was married at San Francisco, Cal., in 1937 to an American citizen spouse and has three American…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. MacIntoshSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Tutun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. United States v. SchwimmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Hunter v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Brigham v. HughsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. BRANTIGANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1966
  2. Ly Shew v. AchesonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
  3. In Re Naturalization of OlanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1966
  4. In re Wong Sie LimDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1947
  5. In re Kazuichi TsujiDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API