Legal Opinion

United States v. Schwimmer

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 27, 1929No. 484PublishedCited by 246 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

Respondent filed a petition for naturalization in the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The court found her unable, without mental reservation, to take the prescribed oath of allegiance and not attached to the principles of the Constitution of the United States and not well disposed to the good order and happiness of the same; and it denied her application. The Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decree and. directed the District Court to grant respondent’s petition. 27 F. (2d) 742.

'The Naturalization Act of June 29, 1906 requires:

“ He [the applicant for naturalization]…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Selective Draft Law CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Luria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Tutun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. United States v. GinsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Spratt v. SprattSupreme Court of the United States · 1830

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by246 opinions

  1. Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. MacIntoshSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Matal v. TamSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  4. Girouard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Hamilton v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

241 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API