Legal Opinion

Fulton v. Heffelfinger

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 1899No. 2,847PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Wells Qireuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, J. —

The appellee’s complaint contained two paragraphs. The first showed an indebtedness of the appellant to the appellee on account for work and labor, for certain articles sold and delivered and cash expended, and for board and lodging furnished for employes of the appellant, all at his special instance and request. In a bill of particular's filed with this paragraph was a charge of $252, dated February 27, 1897, for one year’s work on a farm. There were also other items of account for- boarding furnished, articles sold, and cash paid, all prior to July 1, 1897.

*105.In the second…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. French v. CunninghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Chatard v. O'DonovanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Richardson v. Eagle Machine WorksIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Fitzmaurice v. PuterbaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Wolcott v. YeagerIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. School District No. 104, Fergus CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Mug v. OstendorfIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Parr v. McDadeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Heffelfinger v. FultonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Faultless Castor Corp. v. United Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers of AmericaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API