Fullmer v. Collard
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
In this prisoner habeas corpus case, Willard Fullmer claims that Bea Collard and Carolee Kelly, who are sentencing specialists at the Idaho Department of Correction, 1 have miscalculated the sentence completion date for one of his sentences. We agree. We therefore reverse the trial court’s order denying Fullmer’s petition.
I
BACKGROUND
This case involves the interaction of consecutive sentences for the crimes of sexual abuse and escape, and a resentencing on the escape charge. To give context to our discussion, before we delve into the details of Fullmer’s sentences, a brief…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Johnson v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
- Brennan v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. MendenhallIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
- Brandt v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. StevensIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Cafferty v. State, Dept. of Transp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. HayesIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Michael P. MartinIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. StevensIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.