Legal Opinion

State v. Michael P. Martin

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided February 12, 2016No. 43123PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUTIERREZ, Judge.

Michael P. Martin appeals from the district court’s order denying his Idaho Criminal Rule 35(c) motion for credit for time served. Specifically, he argues that his sentence did not reflect the appropriate credit for time served because it did not specify that the credit was to be applied toward both counts. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 2010, Martin was convicted of driving under the influence and leaving the scene of an accident, Idaho Code §§ 18-8004(l)(a), 18-8007. On the first count, the court imposed a unified sentence of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. Dameniel Preston OwensIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Mahaffey v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State v. William Franklin WolfeIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. CovertIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. State v. Albert Ray MooreIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Corey D. Young and Marco A. Rios-LopezIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. HenleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. State v. AllenIdaho Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. State v. Robert Wesley TibbittsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State v. ShanahanIdaho Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API