Legal Opinion

Cox v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 20, 1953No. 31433PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROCHE, Chief Judge.

This is an action for damages for false imprisonment. Plaintiff was convicted of desertion by an Army -Court Martial on June 10, 1949, and this conviction was disapproved by a reviewing officer five days later. At no time subsequent was he retried by an Army Court Martial for desertion. Basically, the controversy resolves itself into three questions:(a) Has this court jurisdiction to hear and determine the issues herein in view of the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1495?(b) From the facts as disclosed by the record and the evidence introduced at the trial, is there a sufficient…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cox v. WedemeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  2. Franklin Furniture Co. v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  3. McLean v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1947
  4. Cox v. FredericksDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1950

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Forrest v. United StatesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976
  2. Forrest v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  3. Calloway v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1977
  4. Forrest v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API