Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Forrest v. United States

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided June 27, 1977No. 32,862; CM 425279Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCook, Judge

A proceeding for a certificate of innocence is civil in nature. United States v. Brunner, 200 F.2d 276 (6th Cir. 1952). Its purpose is to establish, not just that the accused was acquitted of a criminal charge because there was reasonable doubt of his guilt, but that, in fact, he did not “commit any of the acts charged,” or his acts “constituted no offense.” 28 U.S.C. § 2513(a)(2). The statute creating the proceeding may, indeed, apply to a Court of Military Review as the Army court held, but it does not follow that an appeal from a determination of that court lies to this Court.

The Court of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McPhail v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. BrunnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  3. Floyd J. Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. Rigsbee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  5. McLean v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API