Legal Opinion

Cox v. Fredericks

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 27, 1950No. 29251PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERSKINE, Judge.

This action involves a petition for a writ of habeas corpus alleging that petitioner is unlawfully imprisoned under the color of authority of the respondent. Upon issuance of the writ and return thereto by the respondent, a hearing was -held, at which time the following facts were determined: ■ -

1. On June 20, 1941, the petitioner, Milton Harold 'Cox, returned his Selective Service Questionnaire to the Local Draft Board No. 111, Santa Clara County, California, as required by the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 301 et seq. In this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cramer v. FranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  2. United States Ex Rel. Hull v. StalterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
  3. Mayborn v. HeflebowerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  4. United States ex rel. Altieri v. FlintDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1943
  5. Preferred Accident Ins. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cox v. WedemeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  2. Pine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
  3. Cox v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API