Glover v. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.
At this stage of the proceeding we -are concerned with allegation only, not with proof. For -the purpose of testing the suffi*42ciency of the complaint, all well-pleaded facts are deemed admitted by the demurrer. Riddle v. Artis, 246 N.C. 629, 99 S.E. 2d 857; Lewis v. Lee, 246 N.C. 68, 97 S.E. 2d 469; Skinner v. Evans, 243 N. C. 760, 92 S.E. 2d 209; Clinard v. Lambeth, 234 N.C. 410, 67 S.E. 2d 452; Sabine v. Gill, 229 N.C. 599, 51 S.E. 2d 1. Do the facts so pleaded, taken as true, and liberally construed in favor of the pleader, state a cause of action? If so, the demurrer should have been…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Marchitto v. Central R. Co. of NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- De Villars Et Vir v. HesslerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Shaffer v. Morris BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Atkinson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Clinard v. LambethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Williams v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- L & M GAS COMPANY v. LeggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- REDEVELOPMENT COM'N OF HIGH POINT v. Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Fiorita v. McCorkleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Seymour v. WS BOYD SALES COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.