Legal Opinion

Glover v. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 8, 1959No. 173PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.

At this stage of the proceeding we -are concerned with allegation only, not with proof. For -the purpose of testing the suffi*42ciency of the complaint, all well-pleaded facts are deemed admitted by the demurrer. Riddle v. Artis, 246 N.C. 629, 99 S.E. 2d 857; Lewis v. Lee, 246 N.C. 68, 97 S.E. 2d 469; Skinner v. Evans, 243 N. C. 760, 92 S.E. 2d 209; Clinard v. Lambeth, 234 N.C. 410, 67 S.E. 2d 452; Sabine v. Gill, 229 N.C. 599, 51 S.E. 2d 1. Do the facts so pleaded, taken as true, and liberally construed in favor of the pleader, state a cause of action? If so, the demurrer should have been…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Marchitto v. Central R. Co. of NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  2. De Villars Et Vir v. HesslerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Shaffer v. Morris BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Atkinson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  5. Clinard v. LambethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Williams v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. L & M GAS COMPANY v. LeggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. REDEVELOPMENT COM'N OF HIGH POINT v. Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Fiorita v. McCorkleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  5. Seymour v. WS BOYD SALES COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API