Legal Opinion
Tharp v. San Joaquin Valley Securities Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 25, 1937No. Civ. No. 1749PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
One Ogelsby was engaged in the business of selling Reo automobiles in Porterville and Tulare. The San Joaquin Valley Securities Company, hereinafter called the appellant, was engaged in the business of financing retail dealers in automobiles and had been “flooring” cars for Ogelsby for more than a year and a half. On May 11, 1931, the appellant purchased a Rea automobile and delivered it to Ogelsby, taking back a trust receipt, an agreement of purchase and a promissory note for the balance of the purchase price. It did not cause the automobile to be registered or licensed with the Department…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pacific Finance Corp. v. HendleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Washington Lumber & Millwork Co. v. McGuireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Johnson v. SchimpfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Fair Oaks Bank v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Klepper v. American-LaFrance Fire Engine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commercial Credit Co. v. Barney Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- General Credit, Inc. v. Universal Credit Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank v. Beverly Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Canandaigua National Bank & Trust Co. v. Commercial Credit Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1953
- Lo Bue v. PorrazzoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.