Fair Oaks Bank v. Johnson
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
This is an action brought to collect the amount alleged to be due on a promissory note and to foreclose a mortgage given to secure the same. The note and mortgage were executed by the defendant Johnson in favor of the defendant Slocum and assigned by the latter to plaintiff. The complaint is in the usual form of a complaint for the foreclosure of a mortgage. The defendant Johnson answered alleging that the note and mortgage were given in payment of a second-hand Avery tractor purchased by him from the defendant Slocum and that the latter, in order to induce Johnson to purchase said tractor,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wheaton v. North British and Merchantile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Chapman v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Franklin v. MeridaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Burk v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Clarke v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Roam v. KoopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- California State Automobile Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- DiPietro v. Sipex Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Channell v. AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- California School Employees Association v. Jefferson Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.