United States v. Omer Thomas Caron
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, Circuit Judge:
The sole issue in this case is whether evidence procured by means of a wiretap may be introduced by the government for impeachment purposes without a prior determination by the trial court that the wiretap was lawful. We affirm on the basis of Walder v. United States, 347 U.S. 62, 74 S.Ct. 354, 98 L.Ed. 503 (1954).
The facts are as follows. On June 10, 1971, a two count indictment was returned against appellant Caron, charging that he had on two occasions given false testimony in an appearance before a federal grand jury on April 7, 1971. Count One of the indictment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Walder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
3Cited by44 opinions
- Forsyth v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Williams v. PoulosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- State v. KiddCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Jacks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
- Jack Holland Anthony v. United States of America, Jack Holland Anthony v. United States v. Vernon v. Sisney, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.