Legal Opinion
Jack Holland Anthony v. United States of America, Jack Holland Anthony v. United States v. Vernon v. Sisney, Intervenor-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 5, 1982No. 80-1953, 81-2020PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Circuit Judge.
These are consolidated appeals. Jack Holland Anthony appeals from his conviction under 18 U.S.C.A. § 2511(l)(a), unlawful interception of wire communications. Dr. Vernon V. Sisney appeals from the District Court’s order denying him standing to oppose Anthony’s motion for discovery in aid of Anthony’s motion for new trial and order requiring discovery of certain tapes which were the product of Anthony’s unlawful interception of wire communications.
Anthony was charged with illegally wiretapping the telephones of Dr. Richard Sternlof, Dr. Vernon V. Sisney and Dr. Jerry…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Forsyth v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Williams v. PoulosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Breakthrough Management Group, Inc. v. Chukchansi Gold Casino & ResortCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Raul ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.