State v. Kidd
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtOrth, J.
I
In a criminal cause, when the prosecution introduces an extrajudicial confession or admission 1 given by the defendant to the authorities, the basic rule is that it must, upon proper challenge, establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the statement was obtained (1) voluntarily, and (2) in conformance with the dictates of Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U. S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602 (1966).(1)
The first requisite is bottomed upon constitutional grounds. In Bram v. United States, 168 U. S. 532, 542, 18 S. Ct. 183 (1897), the Supreme Court of the United States declared: °
In criminal…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Ibn-Tamas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Hillard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Ball v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.