Legal Opinion
Nicastro Associates, Inc. v. C. F. Wooding Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 17, 1985No. 2139PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
This case presents the issue of whether an employment agency is entitled to a fee for submitting to a potential employer the resume of a person who was ultimately hired, but hired on the basis of the person’s independent response to the employer’s newspa*245per advertisement. The defendant appeals1 from a judgment for the plaintiff. We find error.
The facts from which this case arose are as follows: The plaintiff is an employment agency which had provided some services for the defendant company in the past. Through the plaintiffs efforts, Steven Cohen was interviewed for a position with the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Providence Electric Co. v. Sutton Place, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Monarch Accounting Supplies, Inc. v. PreziosoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Richter v. DrenckhahnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Marshall v. Sturgess & Jockmus, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Kane v. BrunneauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- R.P. Clarke Personnel, Inc. v. Commonwealth National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Menard v. GentileConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Management Recruiters of Marysville, Inc. v. Brown Group Recreational Products, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1986
- Michele Matthews, Inc. v. Kroll & TractNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Mal Spinrad of St. Louis, Inc. v. Olsen-Stelzer Boot & Saddlery Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.