Legal Opinion
Richter v. Drenckhahn
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 6, 1960PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBald wist, C. J.
The plaintiff, a real estate agent, recovered a judgment against the named defendant, hereinafter called the defendant, for a commission on the sale of real estate belonging to her and her two sons. She has appealed, assigning error in the finding of subordinate facts, in a ruling on evidence, and in the court’s conclusion from the subordinate facts. The errors assigned in the finding were waived during argument in this court and will not be considered.
The facts can be stated in summary as follows: On July 30, 1956, the defendant and her two sons owned a parcel of -undeveloped land on Sheep…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brown v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Banks v. Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- Housatonic Valley Insurance Agency, Inc. v. KlipsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Metz v. Hvass Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Fisher v. HansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Busker v. United Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Menard v. Coronet Motel, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Marshall v. Sturgess & Jockmus, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Potter v. Ridge Realty CorporationConnecticut Superior Court · 1969
- Nicastro Associates, Inc. v. C. F. Wooding Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.