Legal Opinion

Mal Spinrad of St. Louis, Inc. v. Olsen-Stelzer Boot & Saddlery Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 21, 1986No. 2-85-169-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

*814OPINION

HUGHES, Justice (Retired, Sitting by Assignment).

Mal Spinrad of St. Louis, Inc., has appealed the directed verdict judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of Olsen-Stel-zer Boot & Saddlery Co., appellee, and against it in its suit based on contract for services rendered to appellee.

We affirm.

Appellant is an employment agency that specializes in foot-wear industry personnel. Appellee is a custom boot-making business. Appellant mailed appellee an unsolicited flyer containing brief resumes of numerous shoemaking personnel. In response to the flyer, Travis Bond, who was appellee’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McKelvy v. BarberTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Sealy Oil Mill & Mfg. Co. v. Bishop Mfg. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  3. Monk v. Dallas Brake & Clutch Service Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  4. Petroscience Corporation v. Diamond Geophysical, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Henry S. Miller Residential Service Corp. v. Arthur, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API