Legal Opinion

In Re Rosencrantz

California Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1931No. Docket No. Crim. 3414PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.

This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

Petitioner was tried in the Superior Court of Alameda County and convicted of a violation of section 476a of the Penal Code. The information filed against her also charged the prior conviction of three separate felonies. Petitioner admitted the second and third, but denied the alleged first prior conviction. A finding against her was made on this issue, and she was thereupon sentenced to life imprisonment without eligibility for parole, under the provisions of section 644 of the Penal Code.

Petitioner has heretofore made application for writs of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re RosencrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. In Re Petition of MorckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. People v. BigelowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. In Re AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. In Re McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. In Re SeeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. In Re JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API