Legal Opinion

Baker v. Mayer

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 2004No. 20030324PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Gary Mayer appeals from a disorderly conduct restraining order directing him to have no contact with Phyliss Baker. We reverse, concluding the trial court abused its discretion when it found reasonable grounds existed for a disorderly conduct restraining order against Mayer.

I

[¶ 2] Baker broke off a romantic relationship with Mayer approximately three years before she petitioned the trial court for a restraining order in July 2003, based upon his actions over the prior year.

[¶ 3] In Baker’s Petition for Disorderly Conduct Restraining Order, she alleged Mayer followed her,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Svedberg v. StamnessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Gullickson v. KlineNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Skadberg v. SkadbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Tibor v. LundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Weninger v. GrzeskowiakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wetzel v. SchlenvogtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Cusey v. NagelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Meier v. SaidNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Hoggarth v. KroppNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Mead v. HatzenbellerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API