Cusey v. Nagel
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Trayce Nagel appealed from a disorderly conduct restraining order directing that she have no contact with Keith Cusey for a two-year period. Because we conclude the trial court abused its discretion in finding reasonable grounds existed for the disorderly conduct restraining order, we reverse.
I
[¶ 2] Cusey dated Nagel from August 2003 until March 2004, when Cusey began dating another woman. On April 22, 2004, Cusey petitioned for a disorderly conduct restraining order. In the sworn affidavit accompanying the petition, Cusey said:
March ■ 2, 2004 I started dating Kyle…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Svedberg v. StamnessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Gullickson v. KlineNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Wishnatsky v. HueyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Skadberg v. SkadbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Tibor v. LundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Wetzel v. SchlenvogtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Meier v. SaidNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Hanisch v. KroshusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Gonzalez v. WitzkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Harris v. HarrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.