Legal Opinion

Cusey v. Nagel

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 2005No. 20040241PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Trayce Nagel appealed from a disorderly conduct restraining order directing that she have no contact with Keith Cusey for a two-year period. Because we conclude the trial court abused its discretion in finding reasonable grounds existed for the disorderly conduct restraining order, we reverse.

I

[¶ 2] Cusey dated Nagel from August 2003 until March 2004, when Cusey began dating another woman. On April 22, 2004, Cusey petitioned for a disorderly conduct restraining order. In the sworn affidavit accompanying the petition, Cusey said:

March ■ 2, 2004 I started dating Kyle…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Svedberg v. StamnessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Gullickson v. KlineNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Wishnatsky v. HueyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Skadberg v. SkadbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Tibor v. LundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Wetzel v. SchlenvogtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Meier v. SaidNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Hanisch v. KroshusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Gonzalez v. WitzkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Harris v. HarrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API