Whiteco Industries, Inc. v. Nickolick
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, Judge.
Defendant-appellant, Whiteco Industries, Inc. (Whiteco), brings this interlocutory appeal challenging two final orders of partial summary judgment entered in favor of plaintiff-appellees, Joe J. and Mary A. Nickolick (the Nickolicks). Three issues are presented by Whiteco's appeal. They are:
I. Whether the trial court erred in finding Whiteco had no right to exercise an option to purchase.
II. Whether the trial court erred in allowing the Nickolicks to recover for unpaid rent.
III. Whether the two summary judgments are inconsistent.
We can find no error or inconsistency in the trial…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Teitge v. Remy Const. Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Robinson v. KinnickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Kann v. BrooksIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Whiteco Industries, Inc. v. NickolickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Hafemann v. KorinekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Fresh Cut, Inc. v. FazliIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Zawistoski v. Gene B. Glick Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Chesterfield Management, Inc. v. CookIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Nobles v. CartwrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Town of Montezuma v. DownsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.