Legal Opinion

Kann v. Brooks

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1913No. 7,833PublishedCited by 24 opinions

From Monroe Circuit Court; James B. Wilson, Judge. Action by "William L. Kann against Morton F. Brooks and others. From a judgment for defendants, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFelt, P. J.

This is a suit by appellant against appellees to recover damages for an alleged breach of the covenants of a lease. Appellant has assigned as error the overruling of his motion for a new trial. The lease, which was for a stone mill, was executed on January 12, 1903, and by successive continuations was in force until March 31, 1908. The complaint avers breaches of the covenants to keep the property in good and sufficient repair. The covenants relied on are as, follows: “And the said Brooks-Curtis Stone Company hereby covenants and agrees to use due care and at the termination of this lease…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Reissner v. OxleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Board of Commissioners v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Roush v. RoushIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Childers v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Irwin v. KilburnIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Fort Wayne Cablevision v. Indiana & Michigan Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Geyer v. LietzanIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Miller v. BelknapIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Whiteco Industries, Inc. v. NickolickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. AHLBORN v. City of HammondIndiana Supreme Court · 1953

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API