Town of Montezuma v. Downs
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, Judge.
In this interlocutory appeal, appellants/cross-appellees Town of Montezuma and Montezuma Municipal Gas Utility (Montezuma) challenge the trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment in favor of appel-lee/cross-appellant Kristy S. Downs individually, as personal representative of the Estate of Ivan Dean Downs, and as guardian of Susan and Matthew Downs. In particular, Montezuma contends that genuine issues of material fact exist which preclude the entry of summary judgment on the issue of its violation of several federal regulations. On cross-appeal, Downs contends that the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Indiana Department of Human Services v. FirthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Ogden Estate Ex Rel. Ogden v. Decatur County HospitalIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Flowers v. Bd. of Comrs. of Vanderburgh CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
- Ray v. GoldsmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Inland Steel v. PequignotIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- PSI Energy, Inc. v. Home Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Lachenman v. SticeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Milledge v. OaksIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Lindsey v. DeGrootIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- American United Life Insurance Co. v. DouglasIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.