Legal Opinion

Bavin & Burch Co. v. Bard

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1927No. Docket No. 5305PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

In this action plaintiff sues to recover on an express contract for work and labor performed for, and materials furnished to, defendants. It seeks, further, to enforce a claim of lien against the premises benefited by such labor and materials. Judgment went for plaintiff against defendants and the case comes here on appeal by defendants.

The defendants Bard and Berkowitz are lessees of the premises owned by the remaining defendants, and the judgment was against the said lessees only, with decree foreclosing the lien.

There is no question presented involving the procedure as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dermott v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  2. McFadden v. O'DonnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Abells v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. Headley v. CavileerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  5. White v. San Rafael & San Quentin RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Roscoe Moss Co. v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Division of Labor Law Enforcement v. Ryan Aeronautical Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. C. F. Bolster Co. v. J. C. Boespflug Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Connersville Country Club v. F. N. Bunzendahl, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Opdyke & Butler v. SilverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API