D'ANGELO v. Cornell Paperboard Products Co.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether the amended complaint and cross complaint states any cause of action by Employers against Indemnity. The well-established rule, of course, is to construe the complaint liberally in testing whether the demurrer should be sustained.

The pertinent portions of the amended complaint and cross complaint here are as follows:

“5. James D’Angelo, while in the scope of his work and employment, on or about the 9th day of January, 1958, received . . . personal injuries .... As a result of such injuries said James D’Angelo was permanently disabled and incurred…