Legal Opinion

Marastoni v. Lucey

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1974PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

Consolidated in this opinion are two appeals by Attilio and Julia Marastoni from a separate decree and judgment.

Marastoni v. Lucey and Krumm is a suit for specific performance of an oral agreement to extend the term of lease on an existing written lease to April, 1975. The trial court found for defendants Lucey and Krumm and dismissed the complaint.

Lucey and Krumm v. Marastoni is a forcible entry and detainer action, filed shortly after the decree in the above suit, to gain possession of the premises ieased by the Marastonis. By agreement of counsel, the court took judicial knowledge of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Young v. NEILLOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Bevan v. TemplemanOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Norman v. Jerich CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Karamanos v. HammOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Bennett v. PrattOregon Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Murray v. LaugsandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Port of Coos Bay v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Newport Terminals, Inc. v. Sunset Terminals, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Marastoni v. LuceyOregon Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API