Legal Opinion

Karamanos v. Hamm

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1973PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

Plaintiffs are the owners of commercial property in Portland, Oregon; which was leased to Charles G-. Widman for a period ending June 30, 1972. Widman operated a tavern on the premises which he sold to the defendants, and on February 5,1971, he assigned his leasehold interest in the premises to the defendants. Plaintiffs executed a consent to the assignment of the lease to the defendants which contained the following language:

“As further consideration for the acceptance of this lease by assignee, James E. Hamm and Laurel A. Hamm, husband and wife, the undersigned lessors hereby extend the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Young v. NEILLOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Slayter v. PasleyOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Bevan v. TemplemanOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Bennett v. PrattOregon Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Edgewater Enterprises, Inc. v. HollerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. DEADWOOD LODGE NO. 508, ETC. v. AlbertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Deadwood Lodge No. 508 Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks of the United States v. AlbertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Marastoni v. LuceyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Jahangiri v. 1830 North BayshoreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API