McCullough v. Bill Swad Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.
The case at bar essentially poses but a single question: Whether appellee, by continuing to operate the vehicle she had purchased *183from appellant after notifying the latter of her intent to rescind1 the purchase agreement, waived her right to revoke her initial acceptance. After having thoroughly reviewed both the relevant facts in the present cause and the applicable law, we find that appellee, despite her extensive use of the car following her revocation, in no way forfeited such right.
The ultimate disposition of the instant action is governed primarily by R.C. 1302.66, which provides, in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Frank's Maintenance & Engineering, Inc. v. C. A. Rorerts Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Fargo MacHine & Tool Co. v. Kearney & Trecker Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
- Tiger Motor Co. v. McMurtrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Jorgensen v. PressnallOregon Supreme Court · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Chemtrol Adhesives, Inc. v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Ibrahim v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. CaiazzoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Deere & Company v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Anderson v. Chrysler Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.