State v. Jacobs
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
This certified appeal involves the proper standard to be applied by the trial court in authorizing the involuntary medication of an incompetent criminal defendant to render him competent to stand trial. The state appeals from the Appellate Court’s affirmance of the trial court’s order involuntarily to medicate the defendant, Earl Jacobs, who is incompetent. The state challenges the Appellate Court’s conclusion that the defendant’s first and sixth amendment rights were implicated by the trial court’s order. We vacate the judgment of the Appellate Court.
The record reveals the following…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Sell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. JenkinsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. JacobsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Peatie v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. RhoadsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Lesnewski v. RedversSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. Barker, 21438 (9-7-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.