Legal Opinion

State v. Jacobs

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 12, 2003No. SC 16835PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

This certified appeal involves the proper standard to be applied by the trial court in authorizing the involuntary medication of an incompetent criminal defendant to render him competent to stand trial. The state appeals from the Appellate Court’s affirmance of the trial court’s order involuntarily to medicate the defendant, Earl Jacobs, who is incompetent. The state challenges the Appellate Court’s conclusion that the defendant’s first and sixth amendment rights were implicated by the trial court’s order. We vacate the judgment of the Appellate Court.

The record reveals the following…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. State v. JenkinsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  5. State v. JacobsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Peatie v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. State v. RhoadsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  4. Lesnewski v. RedversSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. State v. Barker, 21438 (9-7-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API