Legal Opinion
State v. Rhoads
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 29, 2010No. AC 30675PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, C. J.
The defendant, Scott E. Rhoads, appeals from the trial court’s finding of guilty following his conditional plea of nolo contendere, pursuant to General Statutes § 54-94a, of assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-61, unlawful restraint in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-95 and threatening in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-62. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly denied his motion to dismiss on speedy trial grounds. Because we conclude that the defendant filed a premature…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. GilniteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. AudetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- State v. ComminsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. CustodioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. RhoadsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- In re SiddiquiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- State of Maine v. Jason J. FolletteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2026
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.