Legal Opinion
D & H THERAPY ASSOCIATES v. Murray
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided May 9, 2003No. 2002-249-AppealPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The defendant, Jeffrey Murray, appeals from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court in favor of the plaintiff, D & H Therapy Associates. We heard oral arguments from counsel for the parties on April 1, 2003, pursuant to an order which directed that the parties show cause why the issues raised should not be summarily decided. Upon hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda filed by the parties and the record of the proceedings below, we conclude that cause has not been shown and that the case should be decided at this time. We deny the defendant’s appeal.
In…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Scarano v. Central R. Co. Of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- William Edwards v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Louis Eugene Russell v. Tom Rolfs, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Athanasios Konstantinidis and Vasiliki Konstantinidis, His Wife v. C. N. Chen, M. DCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by15 opinions
- Gaumond v. Trinity Repertory Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
- Crafford Precision Products Co. v. Equilasers, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
- Peter F. Kilmartin, Attorney General of the State of Rhode Island v. Joan M. BarbutoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2017
- STATE of Rhode Island v. LEAD INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION, INC. Et Al.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
- Steven Iadevaia v. Town of Scituate Zoning Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.