Legal Opinion
Gaumond v. Trinity Repertory Co.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided November 14, 2006No. 2005-258-M.PPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice GOLDBERG, for the Court.
“Facts are stubborn things, * * * and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictums of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” 1 The plaintiff, Shaun Gau-mond (Gaumond or plaintiff), is before the Supreme Court pursuant to a writ of certiorari, seeking review of a Superior Court order denying his Motion to Quash three subpoenas served by the defendant, Trinity Repertory Company (Trinity or defendant), seeking production of an injury report that he contends is privileged. According to plaintiff, the records sought…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Scarano v. Central R. Co. Of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Diversified Industries, Inc. v. The Honorable James H. Meredith, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Kate Frazier v. Fairhaven School CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- Spohn v. Van Dyke Public SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. Doris E. PoulinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
- Press-Citizen Company, Inc. v. University of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- State of Rhode Island v. Lead Industries Association, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.