Legal Opinion

Farrow v. Nevin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1904PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From Columbia: Thomas A. McBride, Judge. Writ of review by Kinder C. Farrow and others against Allen Nevin, as administrator of the estate of John Farrow, deceased. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

On July 20, 1891, the defendant, A. Nevin, was appointed administrator of the estate of John Farrow, deceased, by the county court of Columbia County, and immediately qualified and entered upon the discharge of his duties. In November, 1901, more than 10 years later, he filed his final account, in which he credited himself with $280 for money alleged to have been loaned by him to the deceased. Objections were made to the allowance of this item, because, among other things, the claim was barred by the statute of limitations; but the objections were overruled, and the item allowed by the county…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Garnsey v. County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Southern Oregon Co. v. Coos Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1897
  3. McAnish v. GrantOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Southern Oregon Co. v. GageOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Waldman v. ConnellOregon Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Branch v. LambertOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Bechtold v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Asher v. PitchfordOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Lechleidner v. CarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Holland-Washington Mortgage Co. v. County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API