Legal Opinion
Rosenberg v. Bump
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 30, 1919No. Civ. No. 1675PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The action was brought in the superior court of Monterey County, under sections 3414 and 3415 of the Political Code, to determine the title of certain lands in said county. Defendant had judgment, from which plaintiffs appeal on the judgment-roll.
Plaintiffs claim title to the south half of a certain section 13 and the fractional north half of a certain section 19, while the claim of defendant is to said south half of section 13 and the fractional northwest quarter and the west half of the northeast quarter of said section 19.
The claim of plaintiffs is based upon the following facts: By a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Shiver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Doll v. MeadorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- James v. Oakland Traction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Campbell v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Bludworth v. Lake (No. 1.)California Supreme Court · 1867
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Boyer v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Brown v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- People Ex Rel. Thain v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- People v. HillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Brown v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982